In chapter 7 of Affirming Diversity, I found Nini’s perspective on being mixed race quite enlightening. She sounds like a remarkably self-confident 15-year old, and yet she still finds trouble fitting in to certain social groups. She even feels that teachers sometimes judge her because she looks non-white. Her parents have taught her to know about her heritage and be proud of it. She has learned a lot about her mother’s black South African roots as well as her father’s Polish American culture; her diverse knowledge could obviously be an asset to any classroom. However, she feels that her teachers don’t cash in on her unique perspective. I think it’s important that teachers both recognize and give credit to the diverse backgrounds from which our students come. Cultural heritage is something that most Americans value, and no American, immigrant or not, should feel that he or she has to hide culture from the mainstream world. Sonia Nieto, author of Affirming Diversity, agrees. She had many enlightening experiences as a Puerto Rican-American visiting family in her home country, but never shared them in school because she felt that they would not be interesting for her teacher and classmates or not appropriate for the school environment (p. 259). However, the opposite is true! A girl sharing a story about a frozen tarantula would be a perfect science conversation for her 5th grade classroom.
While reading “Unraveling the ‘Model Minority’ Stereotype,” a relatable issue stuck out to me. Stacey Lee writes that many Korean families placed value on “adopting American” (p. 35), encouraging their children to make relationships with, wear the same clothes as, and take up the hobbies of the white students. However, Korean parents also encourage their students to maintain their Korean roots by “supporting Korean connections” (p. 34), which can be done as simply as walking into a store owned by a fellow Korean. I think the dual-identity encouraged by the Korean families is an interesting dynamic. In this school, the Korean students seem to think that they fit in better with white people than other Asians. However, we later find out that most white students can’t tell the difference between Koreans and the rest of the Asian population (p. 35). The Korean students seem to think that they are getting ahead because of their relations with the white population, but is that just a false sense of security based on the adoption of the mainstream culture?
Another point of the book I found interesting was that school administrators “denied the existence of racial tension among Academic students” and believed “interracial relations were good” (p. 96). However, by simply observing the lunch room, Lee can conclude that students obviously separated themselves by race or culture. Furthermore, the “culture of competition” at Academic also caused a lot of racial tension, as the tracking system and elite activities may turn certain ethnic groups against one another. Students began to blame each other when they were unsuccessful, and this obviously causes dislike for and mistrust of other students (and generalization of that dislike for all students of that race). A little competition in school might be good, yes, but this school needs to take a look at its tracking system and activity policy so that it stops shutting students out and starting race wars within the school.